New "competition" rules for airlines shun competition
Oct. 26, 2016
In some good 'ol fashioned, end-of-the-presidential-term braggadocio, the Obama Administration announced an unbelievable new "achievement" for airline passengers.
At a press conference last week, the White House publicized "new actions to spur competition in the airline industry."
"Today's Actions Respond to Executive Order Issued on April 15 to Spur Competition, Build on Strong Record to Create a More Transparent, Lower Cost, and Higher Quality Experience for Consumers" -The White House, Office of the Press Secretary
Competition Among US airlines? (All Nonsense)
Is America opening its skies to global airline competition? Will it welcome new entrants into the transatlantic market, particularly low-cost EU carriers? Is the US getting serious about Open Skies treaties it has forged round the world, under the pretext that this was good for the consumer and good for competition? The answer is no, no and no.
Maybe the application from Norwegian Air International has finally moved out of DOT limbo, where it's been stuck for three years? Nope, wrong again.
The press conference was led by DOT Secretary Anthony Foxx and White House
Council of Economic Advisers' Jason Furman. All they did was boast about new regulations they characterized as "consumer protections" for airline passengers.
More Fee Disclosures, Bag Refunds
The administration leaders said they will "explore" requiring airlines to disclose an "all-in-one price" on online travel sites.
This means fees might have to be disclosed upfront in the price. They would include baggage fees, seat assignment fees, and change and cancellation fees.
"The idea here is the department is exploring what are the optional services that are so intrinsic to air services that they should be displayed along with the fare [online]," a DOT official said.
Airlines would also be required to refund baggage fees if luggage is significantly delayed. But what's the definition of a "substantial delay"? DOT will be 'seeking feedback' on that - as well as whether it should differentiate between international and domestic flights and how soon a refund should be issued.
Currently, when a customer pays $35 for a checked bag and doesn't receive it at the other end, they have every expectation to receive a refund. But FlyersRights' experience with the airlines is that they'll refuse returning the money without lots of phone calls and hassle.
It is a failure (or less charitably, a swindle) for airlines to charge you to put your bag on the flight, then not have it arrive with you.
FlyersRights has maintained that consumers are paying more for less while airlines continue to attempt to merge and decrease competition. The number of airlines have decreased substantially between 1979 and 2016, which coincides with increased fares and decreasing customer satisfaction.
In regard to the contract of carriage, it is entirely in the airlines' favor. They don't need to provide anything but a seat from A to B (regardless of the arrival date or time), or a refund if they can't give that to you. However, when you have boarded a flight and paid for the checked bag, there is an implicit agreement that it will arrive with you. Otherwise it would be called 'cargo', and you would ship it UPS.
Flights $1 -- With $199- $399 Booking Fees
Of course the airlines don't want to include their 'gotcha' fees into the fare - the price of a ticket might double!
Not only that, but taxes are a large driver of these 'unbundled' fees, When DOT talks about "requiring airlines to disclose an "all-in-one price" - airline CEO see millions vanishing from their profit margins.
Ancillary fees are exempt from the 7.5% excise tax on domestic airfare. So shifting $20 away from a ticket and call it a 'fee' for something means that the government takes $1.50 less.
Multiply that out by billions of dollars and it's serious revenue gained through tax arbitrage. Airlines will ramp up donations to politicians in hopes of staving off excise taxes being applied to fees. But this is a big a pot of money for the government to ignore. Closing these tax loopholes will likely lead to most junk fees being eliminated.
Yet one could reasonably argue that the value-add fees (early boarding, drinks, food, etc.) allow airlines to differentiate in a way that gives consumers more choice. But the fees that only serve to gouge consumers without providing service (like change fees that often equal the entire fare, rendering the ticket worthless) should be included in ticket prices.
CONSUMER GROUP FILES LEGAL PETITION TO REINSTATE THE RECIPROCITY RULE
For more information call 1-800-662-1859 or email Paul@Flyersrights.org or Andrew@Flyersrights.orgCONSUMER GROUP FILES LEGAL PETITION TO REINSTATE THE RECIPROCITY RULE
WASHINGTON, Oct. 17, 2016 - FlyersRights.org,
the largest US based airline passenger group, has filed a formal
rulemaking petition with the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT)
calling for a return to the reciprocity rule in time for the holiday
Under the reciprocity rule, when a flight is
cancelled or excessively delayed, an airline must place the passenger on
the next available flight, regardless of airline, for no additional
This practice was largely abandoned after airline
deregulation in 1978. Since 2010, however, U.S. airlines were allowed to
merge into four big carriers, the number of flights has been reduced,
and load factors have reached historic highs of about 84%.
when a flight is cancelled, it now takes much longer to find an
alternative flight, and passengers are generally limited to the one
airline without paying a much higher price.
Paul Hudson, President of Flyersrights.org
and a member of the FAA Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee,
observed, "Several years of heightened computer outages have caused
thousands of flight delays, affecting millions of passengers. So the
American public badly needs the reciprocity rule back which worked
effectively for decades to minimize passenger delays and strandings.
The rule would increase the efficiency of the national air
transportation system by matching up empty seats on other airlines to
delayed or cancelled passengers at no net cost to the airline industry."
would also give airlines a needed incentive to improve reliability,
upgrade outdated computer systems and maintain proper reserves. As
those with good records would be financially rewarded and those with
poor records financially penalized, by having to pay for stranded
passengers' transportation on other carriers."
The DOT has the
authority to reinstate the reciprocity rule under its power to regulate
predatory and anticompetitive practices, and to act quickly by issuing
an emergency order.
We are commited to solutions for promoting airline passenger policies that forward first and foremost the safety of all passengers while not imposing unrealistic economic burdens that adversely affect airline profitability or create exhorbitant ticket price increases.
All American air carriers shall abide by the following standards to ensure the safety, security and comfort of their passengers:
Establish procedures to respond to all passenger complaints within 24 hours and with appropriate resolution within 2 weeks.
Notify passengers within ten minutes of a delay of known diversions, delays and cancellations via airport overhead announcement, on aircraft announcement, and posting on airport television monitors.
Establish procedures for returning passengers to terminal gate when delays occur so that no plane sits on the tarmac for longer than three hours without connecting to a gate.
Provide for the essential needs of passengers during air- or ground-based delays of longer than 3 hours, including food, water, sanitary facilities, and access to medical attention.
Provide for the needs of disabled, elderly and special needs passengers by establishing procedures for assisting with the moving and retrieving of baggage, and the moving of passengers from one area of airport to another at all times by airline personnel.
Publish and update monthly on the company’s public web site a list of chronically delayed flights, meaning those flight delayed thirty minutes or more, at least forty percent of the time, during a single month.
Compensate “bumped” passengers or passengers delayed due to flight cancellations or postponements of over 12 hours by refund of 150% of ticket price.
The formal implementation of a Passenger Review Committee, made up of non-airline executives and employees but rather passengers and consumers – that would have the formal ability to review and investigate complaints.
Make lowest fare information, schedules and itineraries, cancellation policies and frequent flyer program requirements available in an easily accessed location and updated in real-time.
Ensure that baggage is handled without delay or injury; if baggage is lost or misplaced, the airline shall notify customer of baggage status within 12 hours and provide compensation equal to current market value of baggage and its contents.
Require that these rights apply equally to all airline code-share partners including international partners.